jsr342-experts@javaee-spec.java.net

[jsr342-experts] Re: new JSRs for inclusion in the Java EE Platform

From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:54:32 +0200

Like most of you I feel that JSON-P and WebSocket should be in the Web
Profile, not the batch

JSR full Platform Web Profile
---- ------------- ----------
JSON-P [X] [X]
Web Socket [X] [X]
Batch [X] [ ]

I also thought that JCache was very advanced and ready to get into Java EE
7. Does anybody here follows the spec and knows how far they've been ?

Antonio

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On 9/11/2012 6:26 AM, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>> We would agree with your proposal:
>>
>> JSR full Platform Web Profile
>> ---- ------------- ----------
>> JSON-P [X] [X]
>> Web Socket [X] [X]
>> Batch [X] [ ]
>>
>> We would also raise the issue of whether JAX-RS should be in the web
>> profile again, as it's a natural match for it (more and more apps use the
>> REST architecture for writing web apps), especially if JSON-P is there.
>>
>>
> I agree. Actually I raised this issue back in February, and JAX-RS got a
> resounding "yes".
> The WP drafts since then have included it.
>
> -Linda
>
>
>
>
>> On 11 Sep 2012, at 01:04, Linda DeMichiel wrote:
>>
>>
>>> We have a number of new JSRs in flight that we expect to complete
>>> within the Java EE 7 time frame and that we believe are appropriate
>>> for inclusion in the Java EE Platform -- namely:
>>> * Java API for JSON Processing 1.0 (JSR 353)
>>> * Java API for Web Socket 1.0 (JSR 356)
>>> * Batch Applications for the Java Platform 1.0 (JSR 352)
>>>
>>> JSON-P 1.0 and Web Socket 1.0 are also both logically candidates
>>> for inclusion in the Web Profile.
>>>
>>> Please let us know if you support adding these technologies to the
>>> full Java EE 7 Platform and Web Profile.
>>>
>>> JSR full Platform Web Profile
>>> ---- ------------- ----------
>>> JSON-P [ ] [ ]
>>> Web Socket [ ] [ ]
>>> Batch [ ] [ ]
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that we certainly would also like to include JCACHE (JSR 107),
>>> Concurrency Utilities for Java EE (JSR 236), and Java State Management
>>> (JSR 350), but at this time we are less certain about their readiness
>>> in the Java EE 7 timeframe. Hopefully, however, we will be able to
>>> ask you about their inclusion in the coming months.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> -Linda
>>>
>>
>>


-- 
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>|
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris
JUG<http://www.parisjug.org> |
Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>