We're putting off modularity to EE 8. We really have no choice in that
if we want to be aligned with the module system in SE 8.
The possibility to consider is whether putting off other things as well
would allow us to deliver EE 7 sooner, and if so would that be a good thing?
Jeff Genender wrote on 09/27/2011 04:40 PM:
> Bill,
>
> Regarding your original email, I wasn't sure if you were referring to putting off modularity to EE8 or you meant putting off other things?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Sep 27, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
>
>> Jason T. Greene wrote on 9/27/11 1:51 PM:
>>> On 9/27/11 2:56 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
>>>
>>> -snip-
>>>
>>>> We have considered several
>>>> alternatives moving forward, including delivering Java EE 7 with the
>>>> remaining content as planned, or splitting the Java EE 7 release into
>>>> smaller Java EE 7 and Java EE 8 releases, with only a small time gap
>>>> between those two releases, and with Java EE 8 containing only
>>>> modularity support and any remaining original content from Java EE 7.
>>>>
>>>> I know this will be a disappointment to all of us, but I'm sure you'll
>>>> understand the constraints and agree that alignment with the upcoming
>>>> Java SE module system is essential.
>>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> I definitely think this was the right decision to make, and relay Red Hat's
>>> support. Due to the massive impact modularity will have I think it's more
>>> important that EE and SE be cleanly aligned, then for us to be early.
>>
>> Thanks for the support.
>>
>>> The idea you mention above of fast tracking EE7 is interesting. Does this imply
>>> revisiting the main goals? We would love to see some more work on unifying the
>>> specs (e.g. common services like tx, sec, and so on), and that seems more
>>> achievable in a short time frame.
>>
>> At this point we're just collecting input.
>>
>> It sounds like you're suggesting that we scale back some (unnamed) goals
>> and doing more work to unify specs. We're still considering the resource
>> impact of the various possibilities but at this point we think we'd likely
>> have to remove more than just modularity to make a significant difference
>> in the EE 7 schedule.
>>
>> Still, I'm interested in what additional spec unification you'd like to see.
>>
>