Please see Pete's response on the users list.
While this is an alignment issue we should consider, I'd like to first
get further input from the JPA expert group.
thanks,
-Linda
On 6/21/2011 6:48 AM, Werner Keil wrote:
> Forwarding it to other aliases and Pete (although there must be a CDI 1.1 alias by now, too)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Adam Bien* <abien_at_adam-bien.com <mailto:abien_at_adam-bien.com>>
> Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:48 PM
> Subject: [jsr338-experts] Integration of EntityListeners Classes with CDI (Java EE 7)
> To: jsr338-experts_at_jpa-spec.java.net <mailto:jsr338-experts_at_jpa-spec.java.net>
>
>
> Hi *
>
> EntityListeners should be integrated with CDI / EJB 3.2. It means: Java EE 7 DI should work in EntityListener classes.
> An EntityListener could be annotated with @Singleton / @Stateless / @RequestScoped etc. (everything what is stateless)
>
> We should extend the sentence: "Entity listeners are stateless. The lifecycle of an entity listener is unspecified" at
> the page 95 of the Expert Group Draft 2. to "The lifecycle of an entity listener is unspecified in unmanaged
> environments. An EJB 3.2 @Stateless, @Singleton or CDI managed bean can also receive callback events",
>
> What do you think?
>
> adam
>
>
>
> --
>
> Werner Keil | UOMo Lead | Eclipse Foundation| Agile Coach, Principal Consultant | *emergn* limited
>
> 590 Madison Avenue. New York. NY 10022 | 68 Lombard Street. London EC3V 9LJ UK
>
> US Toll Free:+1-877.964.1981 | Worldwide Toll Free:+800.225.53482
> Twitter @wernerkeil |Skype: werner.keil | www.emergn.com <http://www.emergn.com/> | Reshaping IT
>
>