Hi,
I haven't seen the survey results yet, but if Oauth/OpenID Connect is
ranked third there I really think we should try to fit it into JSR375. As
you say, these are widely adopted technologies that Java EE should provide
good support for.
There is also the aspect of respecting the community survey and regaining
some of the trust lost the last year. If we choose to leave Oauth/OpenID
Connect to JSR-Next, we should be prepared for a great deal of negative
response in terms of "*...they're ignoring the community again...*" etc.
To sum up, I am all for including Oauth/OpenID Connect in JSR 375, thus
doing it sooner rather than later.
Ivar
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:39 PM Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a chat with CDI Spec Lead Antoine at JavaOne about OAuth and he
> pointed out, what we did at Agorava (based on CDI) was Client-side OAuth
> and that Server-side OAuth or OpenID connect support would be more complex
> and sophisticated. Probably among the reasons, it's been intended for a
> future Security JSR.
>
> Maybe sticking to the client-side could work for JSR 375.
>
> Check out Agorava-core https://github.com/agorava/agorava-core
> It is based mainly around standard technologies. A few aspects like
> Jackson could likely use the new JSON-B JSR for Java EE 8.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Werner
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:18 PM, arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For OAuth support an issue was created in the tracker some time ago, see
> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVAEE_SECURITY_SPEC-13
>
> So this doesn't seem quite out of scope and would be a really welcome
> addition.
>
> There is of course the question about time and resourcing, but an OAuth
> feature is something that could be worked on fairly independently from some
> of the other open issues.
>
> OAuth is also clearly a more user visible feature and could help with
> making JSR 375 more attractive to a general group of developers. Some of
> the other open issues are more about somewhat technical gaps in the EE
> security architecture like the standardised type for the user/caller
> principal and the role mapper. While quite important, such things may not
> directly capture the imagination of the largest group of developers.
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Will Hopkins <will.hopkins_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
> Experts,
>
> I have been asked to get a sense of how the EG would feel about adding
> OAuth2 and/or OpenID Connect support to JSR-375.
>
> Our plan of record has been to defer OAuth/OpenID Connect until the next
> security JSR, so that we can wrap up JSR-375 quickly and move on to
> cloud-oriented technologies, including OAuth/OpenID Connect, as
> expeditiously as possible. That still seems like a good plan to me --
> anything we do with OAuth/OpenID Connect is likely to require significant
> time and effort to get right, and we don't want to put out something
> half-baked and have to fix it (or support it) later. Deferring it allows us
> to release the existing features of JSR-375 quickly, and move on to
> JSR-Next -- which is more than just OAuth/OpenID Connect -- as soon as
> possible.
>
> That said, OAuth/OpenID Connect ranked third, after ReST services and
> HTTP/2, in the most recent EE community survey. Clearly, the community
> wants OAuth/OpenID Connect support in EE. Both are strategic security
> technologies with wide acceptance and adoption in real-world applications
> today. We could decide to take that on in JSR-375, and probably make it
> available sooner than if we waited for JSR-Next. Or, we could do a smaller
> piece in JSR-375 -- perhaps just OpenID Connect, which is a simpler model
> (authentication only) -- and then add OAuth2 proper in JSR-Next.
>
> Either way, we're talking about substantial additional time, effort, and
> complexity to add any part of OAuth/OpenID Connect to JSR-375. There may be
> other considerations as well -- for example, are there ramifications in
> terms of adding brand new technology areas that were not mentioned in the
> original JSR proposal? We'd have to work through those issues before
> making a final decision. I don't think the upcoming EDR deadline is an
> obstacle -- worst case, we could add a TBD placeholder section for OAuth.
>
> So. There are pros and cons to any course of action here. It would be
> great to wrap up JSR-375 quickly and move on, but given the importance of
> OAuth/OpenID Connect, so doing it sooner rather than later might be the
> right decision even if it delays JSR-375.
>
> What do you all think?
>
> Will
>
> --
> Will Hopkins | Platform Security Architect | +1.781.442.0310
> Oracle Cloud Application Foundation
> 35 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Java EE Security API - JSR 375 - Experts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to jsr375-experts+unsubscribe_at_googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to jsr375-experts_at_googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jsr375-experts/CAAGawe2%3DCucATjBE_dmG%3D-b_envxACM%2BudB%3DE_-ZehnZ2V2KJg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jsr375-experts/CAAGawe2%3DCucATjBE_dmG%3D-b_envxACM%2BudB%3DE_-ZehnZ2V2KJg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>