We're all very keen to hear if there's a result.
New JSRs like this or JSON-B don't have so much "baggage" so they can if
needed move or many aspects already take place elsewhere (mailing list or
wiki/pages) but all the existing JSRs would have a much harder time...
Werner
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> This subject is under very active discussion at Oracle, but we have
> nothing to announce at this time, nor any schedule to share.
>
> Werner Keil wrote on 10/10/16 4:01 AM:
>
> Dear All,
>
> JSR 380 Spec Lead Gunnar Morling just mentioned VisualVM had migrated from
> java.net to GitHub: https://visualvm.github.io/
>
> A project officially run and hosted by Oracle. Is it safe to assume,
> others will follow, or do other migration plans exist especially for Java
> EE (Glassfish) related projects and JSRs?
>
> JSR 375 is actually in a rather lucky position since it's relatively new
> and has not so much history on java.net as other JSRs.
>
> JIRA is used by JSR 375, but 36 tickets as of now seem like they could be
> migrated to e.g. GitHub issue tracker without a massive effort.
>
> Waffle (see https://waffle.io/unitsofmeasurement/unit-ri for JSR 363 RI,
> it only recently moved from JIRA, so there are not so many tickets, as the
> JSR is final, we may stick to the tarball or other archives for historic
> tickets) allows to put an "agile" layer and it's probably not the only
> solution of that kind for the GitHub tracker.
>
> Btw. as of Friday, the Spec Lead change was updated on jcp.org :-)
>
> WDYT?
>
> Werner
>
>
>