users@javaee-security-spec.java.net

[javaee-security-spec users] [jsr375-experts] Re: FORM authentication mechanism implemented

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:35:48 +0200

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Darran Lofthouse <
darran.lofthouse_at_redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Yes since Undertow was included in WildFLy we have been using this form of
> splitting mechanisms.


True, and that will see even more usage I guess when EAP 7 is released.

Still, that is the somewhat older way right? Not yet the one with the
responder that's registered?



> As a JSR for a future spec IMO this needs to be in terms of what is needed
> in the short term and the future, not about how it is already done.
>

Opinions clearly differ there, but the umbrella platform doesn't give very
strong guidance. I personally think standardizing what has proven to work
is an important aspect of Java EE, but there should also be some forward
thinking. By the time the spec is out (especially with the current delays),
and then even more by the time major vendors have implemented it, it's
easily 3 to 4 years later.

So I'd really love to investigate this 2 phase multi-mechanism approach
further.

I haven't heard feedback from the other EG members about this very specific
approach though, so would be great to hear what they think about this.



> Should also add this combination of mechanisms is not just something we
> have thought we can do - it is based on real demand from the end users of
> our application servers.


This is great feedback, thanks!



> I will have a look at this example in some more detail, the biggest worry
> if mechanisms wasting resources generating redundant responses - although
> with a small API change this is not far off how we have it for Elytron.
>

It's indeed not the idea that mechanisms are going to waste responses. The
code sketched below was just a sketch, but it should work exactly like you
mentioned.

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms






>
> Instead of the mechanism populating a response the mechanism registers a
> responder during the evaluateRequest phase - if no mechanism successfully
> authenticates then the responders are called.
>
> Something like:
>>
>> public class MultiAuthenticationMechanism implements
>> HttpAuthenticationMechanism {
>> public AuthStatus validateRequest(HttpServletRequest request,
>> HttpServletResponse response, HttpMessageContext httpMsgContext) {
>> List<HttpServerAuthenticationMechanism> mechanisms =
>> getFromSomewhere();
>> List<HttpServerRequestImpl> requests = new ArrayList();
>>
>> // First phase
>> for (HttpServerAuthenticationMechanism mechanism : mechanisms) {
>> HttpServerRequestImpl httpServerRequest = new
>> HttpServerRequestImpl (request);
>> requests.add(httpServerRequest);
>> mechanism.evaluateRequest(httpServerRequest);
>>
>> if (httpServerRequest.authenticationComplete() {
>> SecurityIdentity identity =
>> httpServerRequest.getIdentity();
>> return httpMsgContext.notifyContainerAboutLogin(
>> identity.getPrincipal(),
>> toList(identity.getRoles()));
>>
>> }
>> }
>>
>> // Second phase
>> for (HttpServerRequestImpl httpServerRequest : requests) {
>> httpServerRequest.getResponder().sendResponse(response);
>> if (httpServerRequest.authenticationInProgress()) {
>> return SEND_CONTINUE;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> I don't know yet how your API exactly works, so the above is just a
>> rough sketch ;)
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Arjan Tijms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21/03/16 18:31, arjan tijms wrote:
>>
>> True, but remember the mechanism as it's defined now is only EDR1
>> status. Much can still be changed.
>>
>> Time as always is a bit of the issue. I only have so much hours
>> I can
>> spend on JSR 375, and there's quite an amount of other things
>> that also
>> would be really nice to have. For instance, we also don't have the
>> multiple identity stores done yet.
>>
>> As for the multiple mechanisms though, is there any other server
>> or
>> security framework that you know of that has this? Or is
>> Undertow/Elytron currently the only one?
>>
>> To get the multiple authentication mechanisms story going,
>> perhaps best
>> to start with creating an issue at the JSR 375 tracker and
>> coding up a
>> proposal for the
>> https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/javaee-security-proposals
>> repo?
>> Do you think the multiple mechanisms could be implemented for the
>> proposal using the current mechanism as a base? E.g. a single
>> HttpAuthenticationMechanism implementation that does the 2-phased
>> "try-authenticate" as you explained before?
>>
>> Additionally, I wonder if any of the other EG members have a
>> particular
>> opinion, idea or use case for the multiple mechanisms story.
>> Would be
>> great to collect the ideas around this.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Arjan Tijms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Darran Lofthouse
>> <darran.lofthouse_at_redhat.com
>> <mailto:darran.lofthouse_at_redhat.com>
>> <mailto:darran.lofthouse_at_redhat.com
>>
>> <mailto:darran.lofthouse_at_redhat.com>>> wrote:
>>
>> I still think there is big gap here in that multiple
>> mechanisms will
>> not be able to operate concurrently.
>>
>>
>> On 13/03/16 23:58, arjan tijms wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just implemented a clone of Servlet's FORM
>> authentication
>> mechanism
>> using the proposed JSR 375 API. A demo app showing it
>> can be
>> found at
>>
>> https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria/tree/master/test/app-mem-form
>>
>> The mechanism itself looks like this:
>>
>> @AutoApplySession
>> @LoginToContinue
>> @Typed(FormAuthenticationMechanism.class)
>> public class FormAuthenticationMechanism implements
>> HttpAuthenticationMechanism, LoginToContinueHolder {
>> private LoginToContinue loginToContinue;
>>
>> @Inject
>> private IdentityStore identityStore;
>> @Override
>> public AuthStatus validateRequest(HttpServletRequest
>> request,
>> HttpServletResponse response, HttpMessageContext
>> httpMessageContext)
>> throws AuthException {
>> if ("POST".equals(request.getMethod()) &&
>> request.getRequestURI().endsWith("/j_security_check")) {
>> if (notNull(request.getParameter("j_username"),
>> request.getParameter("j_password"))) {
>>
>> CredentialValidationResult result =
>> identityStore.validate(
>> new UsernamePasswordCredential(
>>
>> request.getParameter("j_username"),
>> new
>> Password(request.getParameter("j_password"))));
>>
>> if (result.getStatus() == VALID) {
>> return
>> httpMessageContext.notifyContainerAboutLogin(
>> result.getCallerPrincipal(),
>> result.getCallerGroups());
>> } else {
>> throw new AuthException("Login failed");
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> return httpMessageContext.doNothing();
>> }
>>
>> See
>>
>> https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/glassfish/soteria/mechanisms/FormAuthenticationMechanism.java
>>
>>
>> This leans heavily on the @AutoApplySession and
>> @LoginToContinue
>> interceptors, which can both be re-used by other
>> mechanisms,
>>
>> The heart of the @LoginToContinue interceptor contains
>> this code:
>>
>> private AuthStatus validateRequest(InvocationContext
>> invocationContext,
>> HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response,
>> HttpMessageContext httpMessageContext) throws Exception {
>>
>> if
>> (isOnProtectedURLWithStaleData(httpMessageContext)) {
>> removeSavedRequest(request);
>> }
>> if
>> (isOnInitialProtectedURL(httpMessageContext)) {
>> saveRequest(request);
>> return httpMessageContext.forward(
>>
>>
>> getLoginToContinueAnnotation(invocationContext).loginPage());
>> }
>> if (isOnLoginPostback(request)) {
>> AuthStatus authstatus = null;
>> try {
>> authstatus = (AuthStatus)
>> invocationContext.proceed();
>> } catch (AuthException e) {
>> authstatus = FAILURE;
>> }
>> if (authstatus == SUCCESS) {
>> if
>> (httpMessageContext.getCallerPrincipal() ==
>> null) {
>> return SUCCESS;
>> }
>> RequestData savedRequest =
>> getSavedRequest(request);
>> if
>> (!savedRequest.matchesRequest(request)) {
>> saveAuthentication(request, new
>> CredentialValidationResult(
>> VALID,
>>
>> httpMessageContext.getCallerPrincipal(),
>>
>> httpMessageContext.getGroups()));
>> return
>>
>> httpMessageContext.redirect(savedRequest.getFullRequestURL());
>> } // else return success
>> } else {
>> return httpMessageContext.redirect(
>> // TODO:
>> or forward?
>> getBaseURL(request) +
>>
>>
>> getLoginToContinueAnnotation(invocationContext).errorPage());
>> }
>> }
>>
>> if (isOnOriginalURLAfterAuthenticate(request))
>> {
>> return httpMessageContext
>> .withRequest(new
>> HttpServletRequestDelegator(request,
>> requestData))
>> .notifyContainerAboutLogin(
>> result.getCallerPrincipal(),
>> result.getCallerGroups());
>> }
>> return httpMessageContext.doNothing();
>> }
>>
>> See:
>>
>> https://github.com/javaee-security-spec/soteria/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/glassfish/soteria/cdi/LoginToContinueInterceptor.java
>>
>>
>> FORM is a rather nasty mechanism to implement, and
>> going for the
>> re-usable parts took a little extra time, but it does
>> show that the
>> proposed mechanism API is capable of implementing a quite
>> demanding set
>> of requirements (FORM is really surprisingly demanding
>> for such
>> an old
>> mechanism).
>>
>> Do note that both design and implementation are rather
>> rough at the
>> moment and could do with some refinements still. But I
>> think
>> this could
>> work for an early draft.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Arjan Tijms
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Darran Lofthouse - Principal Software Engineer
>>
>> Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No.
>> 03798903
>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (US), Michael O'Neill(Ireland), Paul
>> Argiry (US)
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Darran Lofthouse - Principal Software Engineer
>
> Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham (US), Michael O'Neill(Ireland), Paul Argiry
> (US)
>