Would this include support for web.xml-less configuration using things like Spring's WebInitializer?
Thanks!
Jon Brisbin
http://about.me/jbrisbin
On Aug 15, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've commited initial Servlet 3.0-based implementation, it has to support asynchronous processing (including dispatch).
> The Grizzly version is 2.3-SNAPSHOT, sources could be found @ git branch "2.3.x".
> I'm in a process of deploying 2.3-SNAPSHOT binaries to the maven repo, so they have to be available soon.
>
> Will appreciate if you can test the implementation and provide feedback.
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
> On 08/09/2012 02:15 PM, Matthew Swift wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8 August 2012 20:23, Ryan Lubke <ryan.lubke_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 8/8/12 7:43 AM, Matthew Swift wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> What is the status of the Servlet support in Grizzly 2.x? Is it pretty stable? At the moment it seems to have a dependency on Servlet 2.5 - do you plan to support Servlet 3.0 at some point[1], in particular the support for asynchronous processing?
>> What would you guys think of initial support for Servlet 3.1? The 3.0 async aspect we can support for sure, but if we moved to the 3.1 api, we can expose the non-blocking I/O. Is that of any interest?
>>
>>
>> NIO support is something which is definitely of interest to me in the long term, however in the short term I need to maintain compatibility with existing J2EE 6 containers.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>