users@grizzly.java.net

Re: JMX in Grizzly 2?

From: Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:10:51 -0400

Salut,

Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>> ...
>> Yes file a bug (Many thanks!)
>
> https://grizzly.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=688
>
>> ...
>> Yes if we can have something much smaller, I'm all for ading it to the
>> default distribution.
>
> I had a second look at commons-modeler and it's actually not that big. I
> found out that I don't need the the commons-digester and
> commons-beanutils dependencies which saves me about 400k without any
> changes. So from 2603k I'm down to 2226k, saved 377k.
>
> Something else I noted that startup without JMX is about 250ms and with
> JMX it's about 650ms. JMX adds a 160% startup penalty.

Wow I never measured that. Grizzly does little with JMX so I suspect the
problem comes from common-modeler. We really need our own implementation :-)

A+

-- jeanfrancois


>
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>