users@grizzly.java.net

Re: JMX in Grizzly 2?

From: Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:18:24 -0400

Salut,

Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
> Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>> Salut,
>>
>> Philippe Marschall wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I use JMX in an embedded Grizzly as outlined in [1]. Since moving to
>>> Grizzly 2 (currently 2.0.0-M3) the MBeans are no longer registered. Is
>>> this a known bug or is the procedure different for Grizzly 2?
>> I guess this is a bug.
>
> Should I file a bug?
>

Yes file a bug (Many thanks!)


>>> Also are there some alternatives to commons modeler? My application is
>>> currently 2.5 MB with an embedded Grizzly and 2 MB with an embedded
>>> Jetty. Without commons modeler grizzly would probably be smaller than
>>> Jetty ;-)
>> Yes you don't need commons-modeler. Grizzly doesn't have a dependency on
>> it. The sample I've blogged use it, but you can use pure JMX. You need
>> to implement that interface:
>
> Yeah, just copy and pasting the commons-modeler stuff I need then. Would
> it make sense to contribute this back?

Yes if we can have something much smaller, I'm all for ading it to the
default distribution.

BTW does GlassFish use
> commons-modeler or has it it's own implementation?

commons-modeler.

Thanks!

--Jeanfrancois


>
> Cheers
> Philippe
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>