On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand
<Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com> wrote:
> Salut,
>
> César Fernando Henriques wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm working on a project and I need to decide what framework to use, MINA
>> or Grizzle... I have the following scenario:
>>
>> 1) A Proxy Server or Gateway running in internet that allow mobile phones
>> to access resources and services on PC/Servers behind firewall/nat
>>
>> 2) A Daemon Agent running on the PC or Server that connect to the Gateway
>> (outbound connections only) and wait for messages from the gateway signaling
>> that someone need data, to make it simple, the Daemon create another paralel
>> connection to the Gatreway for every new user wanting to connect to the
>> daemon.
>>
>> 3) A mobile phone that make http get/post request to the gateway to access
>> the daemon resources.
>>
>> II have been playing with mina a couple of days, and really like the
>> approach for managing protocol and messages, the problem is that the APIs to
>> manage http protocol seems to be not mature.. I mean there is a couple of
>> classes like HttpMessage, HttpRequest, HttpResponse but loking at the code
>> don't seems to be following a good pattern.. I don't know.. I don't liked
>> what I see... ;-)
>>
>> In the other hand I have been playing with Grizzle another couple of
>> days... I really like what I see in relations with managing the http
>> protocol, sessions, etc...the simple GrizzleWebServer but was very dificult
>> to get a simple example using comet up and running, and I don't see very
>> clear how to start building a robust solutions with Grizzle (IT's very big
>> and complex!!!!)
>
> Can you share your entire class file so I can try?
>
>>
>> another couple of requeriments to take in mind, I need compression filter,
>> SSL, and a custom protocol on top of HTTP to exchange Encrypted messages
>> with shared key (Previuos PEKE/JPAKE key exchange)
>
> All of this can be done on top of Grizzly Web Framework (HTTP). The shared
> key might be something a little but more complicated as you might need to
> use a ProtocolFilter (from the NIO Framework)
Is there a way to add a ProtocolFilter after de default "Http Protocol
Filter" on GrizzlyWebServer? I Netty is something like:
ChannelPipeline pipeline = pipeline();
pipeline.addLast("decoder", new HttpRequestDecoder());
pipeline.addAfter("decoder","customDecoder", new CustomMessageDecoder());
Do yo uthink it's a good solutions to do something like this?
Thanks,
Cesar.-
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>
>>
>>
>> I hope you guys can help to decide what framework fit better for my
>> project.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Cesar.-
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>