#267 is maybe fixed, not be able to reproduce it , but I will setup Hudson
to run all night my ant task that call the tests.
I would prioritize the defect over the enhancements, but the http client
could be interesting #265.
2008/11/4 Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>
> Hi Jeanfrancois,
>
> thank you for taking care of that :))
>
> Agree with Richard, we need to fix as much as possible issues, marked as
> DEFECT. I would prioritize:
> #267 (as it's not good, when unit test fails)
> #66 (once we switch to 1.9 - we can make some minor API changes)
>
> As for feature I'll vote.
> #176 (could be interested for everyone, who uses http related modules)
> #266 (Grizzly should be ready for AIO release)
>
> Thanks.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey
>
>
> On Nov 4, 2008, at 2:10 , Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>
> Salut,
>>
>> we are targeting the upcoming 1.9.0 for the weeks of November 17. If you
>> have issue you want to see fixed, please take a look at:
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/5mstcu
>>
>> and let us know which want you would like to see fixed. Or course we are
>> trying to fix all of them :-)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>