hi fork-
After looking at the code, I found received data was read into
WorkerThread-related ByteBuffer and thebuffer was cleared before next
reading.In other word, users, who use grizzly to develope network program,
need to manage the received data by themself.
My question is whether grizzly provides the feature managing the
channel-specific buffer like what MINA provides.
The paper 20070712_Grizzly_Architecture.pdf<
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/jfarcand/archive/20070712_Grizzly_Architecture.pdf>told
us that grizzly's performance was better than MINA.
Do you guys know what's version number of the framework the benchmark test
used?
and what resulted in the advantage?
Thank you,
-Oscar