So you're suggesting introducing a <jk> entry with an attribute to point
to the configuration file? I could live with that. I don't like using
<property> elements, though, as I think we should be explicit when we
know what we're expecting so we can check and validate (and document).
On 5/31/10 5:24 AM, oleksiys wrote:
> https://grizzly.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=827
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional comments from oleksiys_at_dev.java.net Mon May 31 09:24:13 +0000 2010 -------
> Justin, just one point.
> We can define jk as<protocol> and specify the property file using XML attribute or<property> of the
> <protocol>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>