Hi,
Yes, if it's by community request than +1
But for now it will fail, until we figure out how to use antrun-extended
properly or get it fixed.
Cheers,
Hubert
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Jeanfrancois Arcand <
Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com> wrote:
> Salut,
>
> Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think that having site, javadoc and source packages build and uploaded
>> to public repository only at release time is a good practice.
>>
>
> We started pushed the src & java docs as a request from this community. I
> would think we should keep it, but I agree executing the site is not needed.
> So +1 for doing:
>
> mvn -P release-profile clean deploy
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> In normal development cycle we don't need those packages to be created.
>>
>
>
>
>
>> Cheers,
>> Hubert.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Oleksiy Stashok <Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com<mailto:
>> Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Grizzly Hudson job should be fixed now.
>> I just have concern about running "site" task on Hudson, seems this
>> task takes very-very long (I started one 2 hours ago and it is still
>> running), I think we can benefit if execute just "clean, deploy", it
>> will make Hudson builds much faster.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> WBR,
>> Alexey.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> <mailto:dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net>
>>
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>