makes sense.
Done.
Thanks!!!
On Dec 17, 2008, at 0:00 , Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Salut,
>
> I think we need a way to pass the backlog when creating an
> implementation of SocketAcceptor. Right now we delegate this task to
> the Transport implementation, but I do think it might be a good
> design to add it at this interface level.
>
> What do you think :-)
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>