Hi,
IMHO this bug should be closed.
Don't think we really need this extension to apply to our
AttributeHolder implementation.
As attributes are used both inside Grizzly framework and outside, by
developers, it's difficult to make any assumptions about possible
parameter types.
What do you think?
Thanks.
WBR,
Alexey.
attached mail follows:
https://grizzly.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=53
User jfarcand changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Priority|P1 |P3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from jfarcand_at_dev.java.net Thu Feb 14 22:28:23 +0000 2008 -------
Not a p1 IMO
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net