Don't know ... never tried that approach nor do I know if there are any
performance advantages of that approach either?
charlie ....
Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what about
> response.append('"').append(value).append('"'); // double quote
> inside single quotes
>
> does it make any sense?
>
> Alexey.
>
> charlie hunt wrote:
>> Don't know if anyone else noticed hamada's commit ?
>>
>> There's a nice enhancement that's done in that commit which makes
>> better use of StringBufffer.append().
>>
>> For example,
>> response.append("\"").append(value).append("\"");
>> will perform much better than,
>> response.append("\"" + value + "\"");
>>
>> With some of the enhancements in compilers and run time JIT compilers
>> this kind of transformation may get done automatically. However,
>> IMO, the explicit change made by hamada is a better approach.
>>
>> Nice job Hamada.
>>
>> Btw, I'm gonna ask Tom Ball who is the creator of Jackpot if a
>> Jackpot transformation rule could easily be created to identify such
>> a usage and also provide the transformation. That'd be a nice
>> transformation to have.
>>
>> charlie ...
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
--
Charlie Hunt
Java Performance Engineer
630.285.7708 x47708 (Internal)
<http://java.sun.com/docs/performance/>