dev@grizzly.java.net

Re: [Proposal] The Grizzly community: how should we work?

From: Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:00:07 -0500

Hi Harold,

Harold Carr wrote:
> Hello Jeanfrancois,
>
>>>> When voting, I would also like to allow non binding vote to count.
>>>
>>> What is a "non binding vote"
>>
>> All non committers are allowed to vote. Right now it means all
>> Observers can influence the release as well.
>
> Is there both a "binding" and a "non binding" voter? I guess I need a
> bit more detail on voting.

It really depends on the community. In Apache, a decision will be
approved when binding (committers) peoples votes but in some occasions
the non committers might vote as well. If they have good justification,
they might influence the release (by marking the build alpha because
they are facing problems).

Thanks

-- Jeanfrancois


>
>
>> I would recommend we keep the conf call (but open to external folks).
>> We just need to publish the minutes in that case.
>
> OK. And I'll try to make the meetings (when my manager's staff meeting
> doesn't happen).
>
> H
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>