Ken:
>> Can we include Ken's new connection cache somewhere?
>
>
> +1
>
> Yes, we must :-) We should put it under modules/connection-cache (pick a
> better name) or directly in the framework if people think it must be
> part of the "default" distribution.
Ken, can you make a suggestion on where they should live and then once we all
agree put the code and build into grizzly?
Thanks,
H