Salut,
Harold Carr wrote:
> Hello Jeanfrancois,
>
>> + Vote on every release, like the Apache folks are doing. This is
>> different from GlassFish where no votes occurs.
>
> I agree. Voting is good. It helps ensure quality.
>
>> + Release frequently, and mark the release as alpha or beta or stable.
>> I propose we start with 1.5.0.
>
> I agree. When you say mark - do you mean also in the file name of the
> download artifact?
>
>> + Branch release and never block the trunk.
>
> I agree. Got to keep the trunk moving (at the cost of needing to
> sometimes make changes in both branch and truck).
>
>
>> When voting, I would also like to allow non binding vote to count.
>
> What is a "non binding vote"
All non committers are allowed to vote. Right now it means all Observers
can influence the release as well.
>
>
>>> Communication is done via mailing lists.
>
>>> Voice communication is extremely rare
>
> Does this mean we would no longer have the Wed concalls?
No. I would recommend we keep the conf call (but open to external
folks). We just need to publish the minutes in that case.
Thanks!
-- Jeanfrancois
>
>
>>> The rules require that a negative vote includes an alternative
>>> proposal or a detailed explanation of the reasons for the negative vote.
>
> I agree - need constructive criticism/alternates - not just a NO.
>
> Regards,
> Harold
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>
>