Thanks, Senthil.
I know this is extra work but it is important, so we very much
appreciate it.
Isn't migrating just doing a zip of all the files and copying them? I
don't have anybody queued up at this point but if they are interested, I
think we should try to accomodate.
I believe Abhijit is trying to get us a machine.
- eduard/o
Senthil Chidambaram wrote:
> Eduardo,
> I like the subdomain names instead of /gf, /jbi like that. jbiwiki is
> there already, you did mention about portal wiki. I'll squeeze up my
> time, deploy this app, and let you know.
>
> Just a suggestion, until we get our machine on our own, I would
> recommend if there are no urgent requirements, then we should hold off
> creating more wikis. So that we will have less problem in migrating the
> wikis to our machine later on.
>
> thx
> Senthil
> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>
>> [Note, copying wiki_at_GF]
>>
>> Hi Senthil - Sridatta and I were talking about coalescing wikis,
>> forums, etc and we talked for a bit about GFW.ORG.
>>
>> We talked about adding a new "web" wiki, for the web 2.0 technologies.
>> Also, I forget if I mentioned that the portal guys wanted a "portal"
>> wiki too.
>>
>> So we have 4 wikis (plus NB).
>>
>> ... /portal
>> ... /web
>> ... /jbiwiki
>>
>> ... /gfwiki
>>
>> We should try to keep a consistent name convention. Perhaps we should
>> drop the "wiki" suffix? (although in the case of the gfwiki we will
>> need to support it as an alternate point for backwards compatiblity)?
>>
>> Also, Sridatta suggested making subdomains as alternates. So we would
>> have
>>
>> portal.glassfishwiki.org => www.glassfishwiki.org/portal
>> web.glassfishwiki.org => www.glassfishwiki.org/web
>> jbi.glassfishwiki.org => www.glassfishwiki.org/jbi
>>
>> gf.glassfishwiki.org => www.glassfishwiki.org/gf
>>
>> What do you think?
>> - eduard/o
>>
>
>