Hi, Carla!
I'm going to help to fill in the gap. Is necessary a user to open the
wiki editor?
Indeed, I never used wiki before (besides lots of experience on other
areas), I'll appreciate a concise Wiki how-to I can read in a hour - so
I can get into production fast.
<just a note>
pt is extension for Portuguse, and (normally) pt_BR is for Brazilian
Portuguese (because our language evolved in this 500 years with several
figures and foreign terms - many from our german, italian and proximity
with spanish language countries, like Uruguay, Argentina, Paraguay and
Chile - and english language countries, of course).
</just a note>
Regards,
Richter
carla mott escreveu:
> I just got the Get Started Guide translated to Brazilian portuguese (I
> used pt since there is
> no language code for Brazilian Portuguse). Anyway, I will make it
> public in the next day or
> so. I have someone in Brazil who may be willing to help out more.
> Carla
>
> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>
>> Senthil, should we just create a gfwiki_br (or whatever is the proper
>> suffix for brazilian portuguese), and start going a bit of
>> prototyping to see how things would feel?
>>
>> The expectation would be that we would have to redo things anyhow,
>> but I think we need the exploration to learn what will and what won't
>> work.
>>
>> We probably should try creating a japanese or chinese site too, to be
>> sure it works for those more complex encodings. Even a single page
>> would do. Maybe yuta or qingqing would be willing to help us author
>> a "hello world"?
>>
>> - eduard/o
>>
>> Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter wrote:
>>
>>> Well, this bug appear to me as midnight ghost... Whenever I'll make
>>> a presentation, it appear.
>>>
>>> About the Brazilian wiki, I'll be happy to put it into life, just
>>> give me the path to follow.
>>>
>>> And yes, I do believe Glassfish has a great room in Brazil.
>>> Everyone who I talk here avoid EJB because bad experiences with
>>> other servers (J*ss, WebSph&r&, and so on)... When I talk about
>>> simplicity on Glassfish management, some even doubt that such easy
>>> server is available - and for free...
>>> I think a good work on marketing should open the doors for Glassfish
>>> and JSP/Servlet and EJB3/JPA in Brazil.
>>> And associated there is a somewhat large base of JBuilder that
>>> should migrate to either Eclipse or NetBeans in future. If depends
>>> on me, they all go to NB with Glassfish server.
>>> There is also great room for OSS on government (the vast major
>>> contractor for IT services in Brazil - as own Sun knows ;-) ).
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Richter
>>>
>>>
>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart escreveu:
>>>
>>>> This indeed seems the behavior we are observing...
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I'd love to see a Brazilian-centered Wiki. Both TheAquarium
>>>> and the Java.Net downloads seem to suggest GlassFish has little
>>>> traction in Brazil, and I'd think Brazil is a natural market for
>>>> GlassFish.
>>>>
>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>
>>>> Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry to put my nose here, but the "stale sessions" is not related
>>>>> to my previous thread "OpenCMS suffering session reset" and the IZ
>>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=888
>>>>> ???
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Richter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll try to pay attention to what I'm doing exactly. I guess my
>>>>>> ideal behavior would be to log me out and leave it at that.
>>>>>> Instead it forces me to reauthenticate, even while I'm just
>>>>>> browsing, not editing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Senthil Chidambaram wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eduardo,
>>>>>>> I've increased the session timeout to 60 mts. now. If you still
>>>>>>> see this behaviour, I think I've to upgrade to another stable
>>>>>>> bits of JSPWiki. I'll keep watching, and check with other
>>>>>>> JSPwiki users.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thx
>>>>>>> Senthil
>>>>>>> Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I find the "stale session" behavior quite annoying. Specially
>>>>>>>> because often it seems to take quite a bit of time to get me
>>>>>>>> back to the login prompt.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am I the only one seing this behavior? Do we know what is
>>>>>>>> happening?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - eduard/o
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>
>