On 4/23/09 2:13 AM, Ed Burns wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:44:53 -0700, Ryan Lubke<Ryan.Lubke_at_Sun.COM> said:
>>>>>>
>
> RL> On 4/21/09 2:25 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>
>>> Excellent, thanks! This is good to hear.
>>>
> RL> I've just committed changes to support the new functionality.
>
> RL> 1. composite:renderUsingPageChildren has been removed.
> RL> 2. composite:insertFacet does just what it says now. It
> RL> moves the facet of the composite component to the
> RL> parent component in which composite:insertFacet is nested
> RL> within.
> RL> 3. added composite:insertChildren. This tag moves
> RL> the children of the composite component to
> RL> the component in which composite:insertChildren is
> RL> nested within.
> RL> 4. added composite:renderFacet. This should be used
> RL> when a composite component has a facet that needs
> RL> to be displayed (i.e. it's not a facet of a component
> RL> within the composite:implementation section).
>
> Ryan, I've added this attribute to<comp:renderFacet>.
>
> <attribute>
> <description>
> <![CDATA[
> <div class="changed_added_2_0">
>
> <p>If<code>true</code>, and there is no such facet present on the top
> level component, a<code>TagException</code> must be thrown, containing
> the<code>Location</code>, the facet name, and a localized descriptive
> error message.</p>
>
> </div>]]>
>
> </description>
> <name>required</name>
> <required>false</required>
> <deferred-value>
> <type>boolean</type>
> </deferred-value>
> </attribute>
>
> You mentioned on Skype that it would be useful and I agree. Can you
> please ensure it gets added to the implementation?
>
Yep, checked in about an hour ago.
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: webtier-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: webtier-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>