Always something. =) OK, no additional application software...can you
perhaps leverage a OS port forwarding feature (ie iptables)? I assume you
have to open a port for your JMS anyway...I realize you're looking for an
official comment from the GF team, which I can't provide...just trying to
get you past your problem so you have a happy client =).
The GF code is available, too, and really not very daunting (fairly
intuitive project structure)...I've had to dig a couple times to get
answers.
S
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Markus Karg <karg_at_quipsy.de> wrote:
> Steven,
>
>
>
> sounds interesting, but is not a real solution for us. We must not use
> other software besides GF.
>
>
>
> It would be really nice if the GF team could post some official opinion
> whether 0.0.0.0 MUST work (= bug in GF 3.1) or GF 3.1 simply DOESN’T
> SUPPORT multiple JMS host IPs. J
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Markus
>
>
>
> *Von:* Steven Siebert [mailto:smsiebe_at_gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 26. September 2014 13:19
>
> *An:* users_at_glassfish.java.net
> *Betreff:* [gf-users] Re: JMS host with multiple IP adresses
>
>
>
> Not sure if this is an option for you..
>
> I have a similar scenario, multiple IPs, must only bind to two (one
> private, only one of the public) for security requirements. I've have
> several GF 3 and 4 servers running successfully by using a JMS server
> outside GF (ie ActiveMQ) (can even run on the same server if you
> wish...even on the same port if you configure GF to disable its own JMS
> service) and use a RAR to access the resource. This works simply by
> avoiding the problem - ActiveMQ supports binding to a any number of IPs by
> defining one transport connector per socket/protocol. On the client side,
> connection information from GF back to ActiveMQ is defined in the RAR
> configuration using the transport url format of ActiveMQ, which gives you
> just as much freedom to define multiple static or failover
> socket/protocols. This required no code changes (I programmed to the
> specification) - only some administrative work.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Markus Karg <karg_at_quipsy.de> wrote:
>
> I tried this in GF 3.1 but it does not work! 0.0.0.0 results in the fact
> that a remote client tries to connect to “0.0.0.0” which obviously does not
> work. Maybe this is a bug in 3.1, I don’t know.
>
>
>
> *Von:* Amy Kang [mailto:amy.kang_at_oracle.com]
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 26. September 2014 09:15
> *An:* users_at_glassfish.java.net
> *Betreff:* [gf-users] Re: JMS host with multiple IP adresses
>
>
>
> In GlassFish server, use 0.0.0.0 for all interfaces, see following
> GlassFish server docs
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19226-01/820-7688/gjktp/index.html
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19798-01/821-1841/gjsdi/index.html
>
> amy
>
> On 09/25/2014 11:37 PM, Markus Karg wrote:
>
> That sounds great! It would be even cooler if the GF manual would say that
> somewhere… J
>
>
>
> *Von:* Amy Kang [mailto:amy.kang_at_oracle.com <amy.kang_at_oracle.com>]
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 26. September 2014 07:23
> *An:* users_at_glassfish.java.net
> *Betreff:* [gf-users] Re: JMS host with multiple IP adresses
>
>
>
> The default-jms-host in jms-service is passed to JMSRA to broker as
> broker's imq.hostname property which can be "*" (all interfaces on the
> host) or a specific hostname or IP address
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18930_01/html/821-2438/aeont.html#gbnni
>
> amy
>
> On 09/24/2014 01:13 AM, Markus Karg wrote:
>
> I have set up GlassFish 3.x lots of times, but today I got stuck… My
> current customer’s server has several IP adresses. The JMS default host
> binds to MYHOST:7676, which effectively leads to the fact that it is bound
> to ONE IP only – but I need to bind it to SEVERAL. If I understand
> correctly, then 0.0.0.0 should bind to ALL, right? Is there a way to
> provide only a SET of IPs?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>