users@glassfish.java.net

Starting a WebServer serving Jersey RS Requests

From: <forums_at_java.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 08:26:11 -0500 (CDT)

Hi. We are building webservices using Grizzly and Jersey and learning along
the way by doing web searches. We noticed two distinct way of launching a
grizzly webserver, but do not see whether one way is better than the other.
Can anyone help, please? #1 - using GrizzlyWebContainerFactory:
========================== public static void main(String[] args) throws
IOException { Map initParams = new HashMap(); initParams.put(
"com.sun.jersey.config.property.packages", "net.gilstraps.server" );
SelectorThread selector = GrizzlyWebContainerFactory .create(
"http://localhost:9998/", initParams ); //noinspection
ResultOfMethodCallIgnored System.in.read(); threadSelector.stopEndpoint();
System.exit(0); }} ========================== #2 - using GrizzlyWebServer
==================== GrizzlyWebServer gws = new GrizzlyWebServer(8080,
"/var/www"); // Jersey web resources ServletAdapter jerseyAdapter = new
ServletAdapter();
jerseyAdapter.addInitParameter("com.sun.jersey.config.property.packages",
"com.example"); jerseyAdapter.setContextPath("/jersey");
jerseyAdapter.setServletInstance(new ServletContainer()); // Another
non-Jersey servlet ServletAdapter simpleServletAdapter = new
ServletAdapter(); simpleServletAdapter.setContextPath("/simple");
simpleServletAdapter.setServletInstance(new SimpleServlet()); // register all
above defined adapters gws.addGrizzlyAdapter(jerseyAdapter, new String[]
{"/jersey"}); gws.addGrizzlyAdapter(simpleServletAdapter, new String[]
{"/simple"}); // let Grizzly run gws.start(); ==================== So which
way is better? Thanks --Alex

--
[Message sent by forum member 'alex-f']
View Post: http://forums.java.net/node/889995