On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Michael Hollatz <
michael.hollatz_at_profitbricks.com> wrote:
> I was not saying that your EJB-implementation is the same as "new thread".
> Effectively, I was saying the exact opposite: Nicolas would be able to
> implement a simple @Asynchronous method on some new EJB that in turn
> invokes the relevant logic.
>
Agreed.
Best,
Laird
--
http://about.me/lairdnelson