Ah, very astute. Yes, the EJB in question is within a common library JAR,
not within the EJB jar. That makes sense. I'm not sure how we would work
around it, but I guess we could remove them from the common library jar and
put them instead in to a "common" ejb Jar. Then we'd have two ejb jars in the
application, (the main ejbs and the common ejbs). Perhaps that would solve
this at least for the short term.
We'll have to try that out.
--
[Message sent by forum member 'whartung']
View Post: http://forums.java.net/node/883988