If I'm understanding this correctly,
it would allow sessions, that would be able to
_never_ (or after a certain amount of time until
they are just put onto disk) expire?
IMO this would be a great feature, as it would make all this
"make a sticky cookie to remember the user without
registration even in the future by putting his data into a special
table and then look it up manually when the user comes back"
stuff a lot more painless.
A huge amount of sites implement this pattern (e.g. bit.ly) and
if we could simply say "the session is moved from memory to disk after 30
minutes and stays there for x minutes/hours/days/months"
it would make implementation of it a lot easier.
Of course, new session-events have to be thrown, like a
sessionPersistedEvent,
sessionLoadedFromMemoryEvent or stuff like that.
That's actually also what terracotta is advertising with their persistent
sessions.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Rajiv Mordani <rajiv.mordani_at_oracle.com>wrote:
> Resending as this didn't make it to the alias because of the wrong email
> id I used ;).
>
> - Rajiv
>
> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Webtier one pager for
> review Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:20:57 -0700 From: Rajiv Mordani
> <rajiv.mordani_at_sun.com> <rajiv.mordani_at_sun.com> To: Dies Koper
> <diesk_at_fast.au.fujitsu.com> <diesk_at_fast.au.fujitsu.com> CC:
> users_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
> Hi Dies,
> We plan to leave this out because we weren't sure how many people
> were actually using it. Do you have a particular use case
> or were you using it in the 2.1 time frame? Is there particular interest
> in the feature? If there is then we can put it back on the table
> for 3.2 (or if we have time in the 3.1 time line we could try it too)
> but at this time it is out for 3.1.
>
> - Rajiv
>
> On 05/28/2010 11:01 PM, Dies Koper wrote:
> > Hi Rajiv,
> >
> > I noticed the following in the Out of Scope section of the one pager:
> >
> > # Time based session persistence will not be supported in this release.
> >
> > I thought it was there in GFv2.1. Why have you decided to take it out?
> > Will this function be added in GFv3.2 or is it out for good?
> > Is this the only session recovery related functionality that was there
> > before that won't be available any more in GF v3.1?
> > There is no mention of it in "4.10.3. Upgrade and Migration". Is there
> > an equivalent function?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dies
> >
> >
> > On 22/05/2010 12:19, Rajiv Mordani wrote:
> >
> >> Please review and provide comments for the GlassFish webtier in 3.1. The
> >> one pager is available at
> >>
> >> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=WebTier
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> - Rajiv
> >>
> > This is an email from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, ABN 27 003 693 481. It is confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to
> > which it was addressed and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy or forward all or any of
> > it or its attachments. If you receive this email in error, please return to sender. Thank you.
> >
> > If you do not wish to receive commercial email messages from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, please email unsubscribe_at_fast.fujitsu.com.au
> >
> >
>
>
--
Dominik Dorn
http://dominikdorn.com
Tausche Deine Lernunterlagen auf http://www.studyguru.eu !