Terracotta supports GlassFish v2.x. I see no technical reason for v3
to be an issue but you should ask TC.
cheers,
-Alexis
On Dec 10, 2009, at 22:04, Dominik Dorn wrote:
> Terracotta integration would really rock.
> Afaik, they also have integrations for JMS + Tomcat etc. already.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:47 PM, John Clingan <John.Clingan_at_sun.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Comerford, Sean wrote:
>>
>> What is the plan around clustering in V3?
>>
>>
>> It is in the plans. Working on the v3.next roadmap. Stay tuned.
>>
>> It seems to have been completely dropped in the initial release.
>>
>>
>> It was not planned for the initial release, but we are working on
>> it for an
>> update release. Note, this is the same approach we took with Java
>> EE 5.
>> First release is Java EE compatible but single instance. Update
>> release
>> adds HA and centralized admin. mod_jk provides service availability
>> for
>> GlassFish v3.
>>
>> Will a V2 DAS be able to manage a V3 instance at some point?
>>
>>
>> No, although moving forward that is an interesting requirement.
>> We'll
>> likely change the remote administration API (JMX/RMI to http-
>> based), so it
>> would take extra effort from v2 to v3, but v3 and beyond ...
>> Hmmmm ...
>>
>> Will there be a V3 DAS?
>>
>>
>> Yep, that's the plan.
>>
>> Or is clustering more or less a dead feature at this point?
>>
>>
>> Nope, I've addressed that above.
>>
>> --
>> Sean Comerford, Software Engineer
>> ESPN.com Site Architecture Group
>> Office: 860.766.6454 Cell: 860.329.5842
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>