From a Java EE perspective there is nothing wrong with having two different applications that
each contain a PU of the same name. PU names are never scoped outside of the application in
which they are defined so there shouldn't be any clashing. It's possible it's a bug. Please file
a bug report detailing the error and if possible including the application itself.
[Message sent by forum member 'ksak' (ksak)]
http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=223082