Ludovic Champenois wrote:
> Why would we want to promote * non Java EE standard* WSs? I don't get it.
I wouldn't be against showing both while differentiating them
properly, but on the other hand ...
> I would really prefer we spend the time to enhance our existing 109 WS
> tester to accept complex parameters :-)
... IMHO there are more important things, like e.g. the above.
MartinG