Displaying non-109 web services would be fulfilling an expectation, not
promoting them, IMO. If it's not possible to test non-109 web services,
then I agree that displaying them is of diminished use.
-- Ed
Ludovic Champenois wrote:
> Vijay Ramachandran wrote:
>
>> As of now, the ws-mgmt subsystem recognizes the presence/absence of
>> webservices by looking for the presence/absence of 109 specific
>> artifacts. Hence this "restriction".
>>
>> Satish - any comments on displaying non-109 based services in the
>> admin console ?
>
> Why would we want to promote * non Java EE standard* WSs? I don't get it.
> I would really prefer we spend the time to enhance our existing 109 WS
> tester to accept complex parameters :-)
> My 2 cents.
> Ludo
>
>>
>> Vijay
>>
[ ... ]