yeah, I think we got a bit harsh on you...
one thing I find interesting in their propaganda is they claim some
level of OSGi compliance while the truth is really not that rosy...
jerome
On Dec 10, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Miroslav Nachev wrote:
> Sorry. My idea was to give some reference to all of you to make self-
> appraisal where we are.
>
>
> Miro.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:55 PM, Ludovic Champenois <Ludovic.Champenois_at_sun.com
> > wrote:
> Judy Tang wrote:
> Hi Miroslav,
>
> Sorry, but this reads as an advertisement for JBoss for me. Would
> like to know what is the point you want to make to the GlassFish
> users in quality alias ?
>
> Thanks,
> Judy
>
> Yes, this is not appropriate. This reminds me the bad practices
> JBoss used to do a while back by posting anonymous blog entries or
> 'astroturfing' (incuding posts from the JBoss CEO!)
>
> See for the reference: http://www.linux.com/feature/36391 and draw
> your own conclusion...
>
> Definitely not a good example of an healthy opensource community...
>
> Thanks
> Ludo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>