Hi Tuong
How is jsunit working for you? Any issues with it? Are you going to
use it for testing jmaki?
Here is an article on testing javascript, that I found interesting, and
the reason I haven't looked at jsunit yet:
http://www.artima.com/forums/flat.jsp?forum=276&thread=157060
The recommendations I had so far, based on the first hand experience,
were for HtmlUnit, Selenium and Canoo. Both HtmlUnit and Selenium RC
allow you to write tests in java, while Canoo is xml based.
lidia
Tuong P. Nguyen wrote:
> Lidia wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm looking for a test framework for automating tests exercising a
>> lot of javascript.
>>
>> Our first choice was HtmlUnit however, since it tries to mimic a
>> browser, it does not handle some javascript properly (e.g. it has
>> problems with hidden fields). I also looked at Selenium IDE. It
>> provides a nice, quick way of recording tests and is a free
>> alternative to SilkTest. Selenium RC is supposed to work for
>> automation, however I haven't had a chance yet to check how well it
>> will work with our ant framework.
>>
>> If anyone has any comments regarding javascript testing frameworks
>> mentioned above or other, that we could use, pluses/minuses for their
>> use, etc, please let me know.
>>
>> thanks
>> lidia
>
> I'm too exploring for a tool to test jmaki and found this free
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsunit .
> Hopefully, it'll meet your requirements
>
> Regards,
> Tuong.