Hi Sahoo,
You're correct, that code was missed. I've made the changes and currently
running some testing. I will update the bug once the code is submitted.
Thanks,
Guy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sahoo" <Sahoo_at_Sun.COM>
To: <persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 5:52 AM
Subject: Is issue 3235 completely fixed?
> Hi Guy,
>
> The code path used by the container is probably not fixed.
> EntityManagerFactoryProvider.createContainerEntityManagerFactory(PersistenceUnitInfo
> info, Map properties) still uses emName to lookup.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> Guy Pelletier wrote:
>> Fix has been submitted for bug 3235 - Strange errors/side effects when PU
>> name is reused in the life of a container...
>> Problem description: Internally PU's were not stored uniquely.
>> No new test added, tested manually. Quicklook and
>> entity-persistence-tests continue to pass.
>>
>> http://fisheye5.cenqua.com/changelog/glassfish/entity-persistence?cs=MAIN:guypelletier:20070712220140
>> Cheers,
>> Guy
>