Thanks, Ian.
Yes, Java Web Start may be a good choice for portability.
I will evaluate it.
Thanks,
Takashi Nishigaya
Ian Evans wrote:
> Takashi Nishigaya <Takashi.Nishigaya_at_Sun.COM> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your valuable sugestions.
>> Yes, @EJB is really good feature in Java EE 5.
>> Maybe it is time to use the client container.
>>
>> But for portability issue, different vendor provides the different
>> command usage for client container. It raises another issue about
>> packaging of the portable ejb client application, i.e.,
>>
>> which is protable? properties + classpath vs. wrapping command line
>
>
> Glassfish/App Server 9 uses Java Web Start to simplify packaging and
> running Java EE App Clients. It's the best solution for running remote
> app clients.
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/quinn?entry=how_does_glassfish_know_about
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3659/6n5s6m5aa?a=view
>
> I don't think we've done enough to promote app client use generally or
> to publicize our Java Web Start-able app client feature.
>
> -ian