Tang,
On Monday 24 September 2012 09:24 AM, Tang Yong wrote:
> Dear Sahoo,Siva
>
> About current implementation status of 3.1OSGi[1], I have some
> suggestions and questions, and want to discuss with you.
> [1]： https://wikis.oracle.com/display/GlassFish/3.1OSGi
>
> 【Suggestions】
>
You are specifically referring to GlassFish3.1/OSGi project page. Since
that release is over long back, is there a good reason to update the
Wiki page?
> S1: About "Upgrading core OSGi runtime (OSGi-01)"
> Currently, Glassfish has used felix 4.x as default OSGi runtime, so
> please update the section, and updatding maybe should put into 4.0OSGi.
>
> S2: About "Implementation of Enterprise OSGi Specs (OSGi-03)"
> ・OSGi/HTTP Service
> Although not finding rfc number, liking other specs, you maybe write the
> following:
>
> OSGi EE Spec 102(OSGi/HTTP Service)
>
> S3: About "Generic OSGi Features (OSGi-05)"
> Once accepting ancoron's patch, the description maybe should be updated.
>
> S4: About "Task List"
> ・Improve module metadata
> On the column of "Status / Comments", wish to add a jira number in
> order to make others know detailed status.
>
> ・RFC #122 CT
> On the column of "Status / Comments", for general, we can not access the
> link of CT issue 1841 because only OSGi Contributing Associates member
> or higher can access the link. So, whether should have a corresponding
> gf jira or not?
>
> ・RFC #98 CT
> On the column of "Status / Comments", the links of 13321 and 13325 have
> been out of date, so please update them.
>
> ・Explore use of CDI in hybrid applications
> As to 3.1OSGi, I think that this is enough. However, with constant
> updating OSGi RFP 146 OSGi/CDI Integration[2], more features of OSGi/CDI
> may should be implemented on 4.0OSGi.
> [2]: https://www.osgi.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=141
>
> ・Provide an API to handle META-INF/services in OSGi context
> Although having been completed, I wish sahoo can offer a jira number or
> link to make us know more contents.
>
See
https://wikis.oracle.com/display/GlassFish/JdkSpiOsgi
> ・Better integration with OSGi Web Console and GF Admin Console
> On the column of "Status / Comments", the link of "usage" is unavailable.
>
> 【Questions】
>
> Q1: About "Implementation of Enterprise OSGi Specs (OSGi-03)"
> ・RFC #142 (OSGi/JNDI)
> Because OSGi/JNDI has been put in OSGi EE Spec 126, I want to know the
> reason of "Due to lack of resource" and whether having a plan to
> implement it on 4.0 or not?
It is not in my priority list. I had already told you kind of things we
are looking at now when you wanted direction.
> Q2: About "Task List"
> ・RFC #66 CT
> On the column of "Status / Comments", is current status still "Started -
> Need to investigate test failures "?
You are looking at 3.1 page. We are now fully compliant.
> ・Support multiple JPA providers for OSGi enterprise applications
> Currently, whether having a plan to support it or not?
No plans.
> ・Stop relying on Thread context class loader for META-INF/services
> Current status?
>
We are still relying on it. It requires a lot of changes in lots of places.
> ・Integration of OBR with deployment backend
> I want to know the means of "Dropped - lack of resource" and now whether
> being still the phrase of collecting user reqirements or not?
>
We want to do it
> ・Provide a la carte access to GF modules via OBR
> The same as above.
Being addressed as part of on-demand.
> Thanks!
> --Tang
>
>
>
>