Hi Tang,
The reason is isn't set in the first instance is because the first
instance uses the value that is defined in the config for the cluster.
Tom
On 9/14/2012 6:52 AM, Sahoo wrote:
> Tang,
>
> This TELNET_SHELL_PORT will ultimately go away once I accept the
> contribution of ancoron. So, let's not investigate this any further.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> On Friday 14 September 2012 09:29 AM, Tang Yong wrote:
>> Hi Sahoo, Tom
>>
>> After I created the first instance(in1) on cluster, I found that on
>> domain.xml, in1's system properties were set as following and
>> "OSGI_SHELL_TELNET_PORT" property was not explicitly set.
>>
>> <system-property name="HTTP_LISTENER_PORT" value="18080"></system-property>
>> ...
>>
>> However, after I created the second instance(in2) on cluster, on in2's
>> system properties setting, "OSGI_SHELL_TELNET_PORT" property was
>> explicitly set.
>>
>> ...
>> <system-property name="OSGI_SHELL_TELNET_PORT"
>> value="26667"></system-property>
>>
>> So, from a user's perspective, whether need to set
>> "OSGI_SHELL_TELNET_PORT" property explicitly liking the following while
>> creating the first instance on cluster or not?
>>
>> <system-property name="OSGI_SHELL_TELNET_PORT"
>> value="26666"></system-property>
>>
>> if yes, I will create a issue on JIRA.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> --Tang
>>
>>
>>
>>