On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Andreas Loew <Andreas.Loew_at_oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Base line: IMO, you must fix the test and remove the state dependency
> between its methods [...]
I think that's *exactly* what Bill wants to do. Running the tests in
random order could tell us which tests need to be fixed.
Frankly, if junit tests are really supposed to be order-independent,
junit ought to randomize them by default so people can't easily write
buggy tests.
Cheers,
Bobby