Can we have the process be to always implement everything in the trunk
first, and then backport to the 3.1 branch if necessary?
Tom
On 1/28/2011 3:59 AM, Sahoo wrote:
> On Friday 28 January 2011 06:31 AM, Chris Kasso wrote:
>> Please integrate all 3.1 changes into the new 3.1 branch*and*
>> the existing trunk.
>>
> Is there a process in place for ensuring that all check-ins to
> 3.1-branch are eventually forward ported to trunk?