dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: osgi start up problem

From: Justin Lee <justin.d.lee_at_oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:33:13 -0500

No, it's in a branch we've created to get a jump on the 3.2 cycle.

On 12/27/10 8:49 PM, Shreedhar Ganapathy wrote:
> Is this happening in the 3.1 code repository ?
>
>
> On 12/27/10 5:41 PM, Justin Lee wrote:
>> That was it. Thanks alexey.
>>
>> On 12/27/10 8:38 PM, Justin Lee wrote:
>>> ahhhhhh, so that's what you meant. OK. I removed shoal from the
>>> build but I'll try that just to be sure.
>>>
>>> On 12/27/10 8:02 PM, Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>>>> Justin, IMO the problem is that shoal dependancy overwrites proper
>>>> Grizzly 2.0 modules with old 1.9.x modules.
>>>> Please try manually overwrite
>>>> glassfish3/glassfish/modules/grizzly-framework.jar,
>>>> glassfish3/glassfish/modules/grizzly-utils.jar
>>>>
>>>> with proper Grizzly 2.0 modules.
>>>>
>>>> WBR,
>>>> Alexey.
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 28, 2010, at 1:29 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/27/2010 06:10 PM, Justin Lee wrote:
>>>>>> I'm working on integrating grizzly 2.0 in to the glassfish tree
>>>>>> and getting the following error and I'm not quite sure how to
>>>>>> resolve it. Everything looks ok to me but clearly something is
>>>>>> amiss. Attached are the manifest files for the referenced bundles:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: Exception while starting bundle
>>>>>> org.glassfish.core.kernel [134]
>>>>>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in
>>>>>> bundle org.glassfish.core.kernel [134]: Unable to resolve 134.0:
>>>>>> missing requirement [134.0] package;
>>>>>> (&(package=com.sun.appserv.server)(version>=3.1.0)) [caused by:
>>>>>> Unable to resolve 56.0: missing requirement [56.0] package;
>>>>>> (package=org.glassfish.grizzly.http.server) [caused by: Unable to
>>>>>> resolve 220.0: missing requirement [220.0] package;
>>>>>> (package=org.glassfish.grizzly)]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any hints?
>>>>>
>>>>> These bundles aren't necessarily the issue. Bundle 220 imports
>>>>> org.glassfish.grizzly and no one appears to be exporting it.
>>>>>
>>>>> -> richard
>>>>>
>>>>