Sanjeeb Sahoo wrote:
> Justin Lee wrote:
>> Index: pom.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- pom.xml (revision 37233)
>> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
>> <jsf-ext.version>0.2</jsf-ext.version>
>> <woodstock.version>4.0.2.3</woodstock.version>
>> <jaxrpc-api.version>1.1</jaxrpc-api.version>
>> - <grizzly.version>1.9.19-beta3</grizzly.version>
>> + <grizzly.version>1.9.19-beta4</grizzly.version>
>> <jaxb-api.version>2.1</jaxb-api.version>
>> <jsr250-api.version>1.0</jsr250-api.version>
>> <jsr181-api.version>1.0-MR1</jsr181-api.version>
>>
>>
>> On a side note, for changes as simple as a version bump when
>> integrating a new version, do we *really* need to get such changes
>> reviewed? Seems like largely unncessary delays and waiting for the
>> most part.
> Change looks good.
>
> I agree with you. Let's add an exception to the review process for
> such version upgrades.
IMO, that should be fine provided that you didn't also make significant
changes in project dependencies, such as adding a new dependency which
will then bubble up into GF distribution...
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Snjezana Sevo-Zenzerovic
Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to
developing practices and products that help protect the environment