Tim Quinn wrote:
> Sahoo wrote:
>> Tim Quinn wrote:
>>> Sahoo wrote:
>>>> In general, there should not be a direct dependency on kernel. Can
>>>> you explain why you want such a dependency?
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> To support Java Web Start for app clients the AppClientDeployer
>>> injects GrizzlyService so it can register and unregister
>>> GrizzlyAdapters.
>>>
>>> That's how I understood this is done. Is there an alternative?
>>>
>> So, you want a RequestDispatcher to be injected or you need
>> GrizzlyService specifically? If former is the case, then dependency
>> on glassfish-api should be enough.
> Looks good. I withdraw the proposed change to the pom.
>
> How about the osgi.bundle change?
If you have the need to access that package from some other bundle, then
the change is fine with me.
Thanks,
Sahoo