I thought about that as well but I had to bump up the version. By v3
final I want to bring the release version to 1.0 and that is why I
started on 0.9 train. Do you see any issue with it?
-vivek.
Jane Young wrote:
> Changes is fine but I have a question. What happened to version 0.7.14?
> See:
> http://download.java.net/maven/glassfish/org/glassfish/scripting/jruby-all/
>
>
>
>
> Vivek Pandey wrote:
>> Please review the jruby version change in the v3 parent pom file. I
>> need to integrate new jruby container, which has the container config
>> related changes.
>>
>> -vivek.
>>
>> Index: pom.xml
>> ===================================================================
>> --- pom.xml (revision 28831)
>> +++ pom.xml (working copy)
>> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
>> <minor_version>0</minor_version>
>> <version_suffix></version_suffix>
>> <build.id>${user.name}-private</build.id><!-- on Hudson and
>> RE, this gets replaced by real build ID -->
>> - <jruby-scripting.version>0.7.13</jruby-scripting.version>
>> + <jruby-scripting.version>0.9.0</jruby-scripting.version>
>> <jmac-api.version>1.0-rev-1</jmac-api.version>
>> <jaxws-ri.version>2.1.3</jaxws-ri.version>
>> <stax-api.version>1.0-2</stax-api.version>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>