dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: SelectorThread and recycling problem

From: Roman Pokhodzhai <rpohod_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:38:46 +0200

Well,

Actually request.recycle() and response.recycle() are called in *postProcess
*method through *inputBuffer.recycle()*, so request is recycled but
*org.apache.coyote.Request.recylce()
*doesn't recycle *notesManager* (doesn't clear it). And I'm not sure that
simple clearing this property in recycle method will help.

btw, I will post it.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Oleksiy Stashok
<Oleksiy.Stashok_at_sun.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> it looks like bug.
> Seems, when DefaultProcessorTask is getting recycled - we don't recycle
> Coyote Request and Response:
>
> @Override
> public void recycle(){
> if ( taskEvent != null ){
> taskEvent.setStatus(TaskEvent.START);
> }
>
> if ( listeners!= null && listeners.size() > 0)
> clearTaskListeners();
>
> socket = null;
> dropConnection = false;
> key = null;
> + request.recycle();
> + response.recycle();
> }
>
> Can you pls. file an issue at https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues?
>
> Thank you.
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:38 , Roman Pokhodzhai wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> 1) "Hum..I'm not sure the application itself is referenced here. Can
>> you elaborate a little?"
>> Our application is referenced through
>> com.sun.enterprise.loader.EJBClassLoader_at_0xefde040. This is exactly
>> the class loader that has loaded our application.
>>
>> 2) "Yes, the notes are used to avoid object creation. As an example,
>> we are putting CoyoteRequest/Response in the note we don't have to
>> re-create those object"
>>
>> Cool, but notes are not recycled anyway. And CoyoteRequest (you can
>> find it in
>> trace)(com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.coyote.PwcCoyoteRequest_at_0x10cda420
>> )
>> keeps a reference chain to our EJBClassLoader even after the
>> application itself is undeployed. And this class loader keeps all our
>> application classes in PermGen memory
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/19/09, Jeanfrancois Arcand <Jeanfrancois.Arcand_at_sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Salut,
>>>
>>> Roman Pokhodzhai wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> If you use tasks recycling for
>>>> com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.SelectorThread in your
>>>> application (it is used by default) then you get the following
>>>> reference chain that keeps the application class loader after the
>>>> application is undeployed:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hum..I'm not sure the application itself is referenced here. Can you
>>> elaborate a little?
>>>
>>>
>>>> --> com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.SelectorThread_at_0xe0a64e0
>>>> (433 bytes) (field processorTasks:)
>>>> --> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue_at_0xe0ba468 (16 bytes)
>>>> (field head:)
>>>> --> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue$Node_at_0xe0caa80 (16
>>>> bytes) (field next:)
>>>> --> java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue$Node_at_0x116288d0 (16
>>>> bytes) (field item:)
>>>> -->
>>>> com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.DefaultProcessorTask_at_0xe0f6180
>>>> (169 bytes) (field request:)
>>>> --> org.apache.coyote.Request_at_0xe10bef0 (153 bytes) (field
>>>> notesManager:)
>>>> --> org.apache.coyote.NotesManagerImpl_at_0xe16b140 (12 bytes) (field
>>>> notes:)
>>>> --> [Ljava.lang.Object;@0xe1c6e90 (136 bytes) (Element 1 of
>>>> [Ljava.lang.Object;@0xe1c6e90:)
>>>> --> com.sun.enterprise.web.connector.coyote.PwcCoyoteRequest_at_0x10cda420
>>>> (190 bytes) (field filterChain:)
>>>> --> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain_at_0x10ce8d48 (28
>>>> bytes) (field filters:)
>>>> --> [Lorg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig;@0x10ce8d68 (48
>>>> bytes) (Element 0 of
>>>> [Lorg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig;@0x10ce8d68:)
>>>> --> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig_at_0x10e2de48 (20
>>>> bytes) (field context:)
>>>> --> com.sun.enterprise.web.WebModule_at_0xf3b73b8 (501 bytes) (field
>>>> parentClassLoader:)
>>>> --> com.sun.enterprise.loader.EJBClassLoader_at_0xefde040 (88 bytes)
>>>>
>>>> This trace shows that Request objects are not fully recycled. Their
>>>> 'notes' are not recycled.
>>>> You can also see it at org.apache.coyote.Request.recycle.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It there some idea behind it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, the notes are used to avoid object creation. As an example, we are
>>> putting CoyoteRequest/Response in the note we don't have to re-create
>>> those object.
>>>
>>>
>>> Or it's just a bug?
>>>
>>> No. Tomcat does this as well.
>>>
>>> A+
>>>
>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>