dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: supporting standalone tests in V3

From: Kohsuke Kawaguchi <Kohsuke.Kawaguchi_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:50:16 -0700

Keith Babo wrote:
> Is there a reason why you couldn't just bootstrap a nucleus distribution
> of v3 in each unit test? If we added some basic hooks for the test to
> declare which additional modules are required, you could configure a
> runtime specifically for the test. If the test itself is packaged
> inside a bundle, you can drive some very sophisticated end-to-end testing.
>
> The above is pretty much how Spring DM integration tests work today and
> it's quite nice.

I think there are several issues.

The first is that this AMX end-to-end test depends on a whole bunch of
other modules, so it has to bring up the considerable portion of GFv3.
So there's a chicken-and-egg problem if you try to do that during a AMX
build.

The second is that we often want to run tests not just during the build,
but also when various GFv3 distributions are assembled, as the behavior
changes subtly depending on exactly what modules you have in the system.


I think what you are describing is also very useful for some other kinds
of module-level functionality tests, and that is something we'd also
like to be able to do, but I think the end-to-end test needs a different
kind of set up.



> regards,
> keith
>
> Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>>
>> I think tests like that better live in its own directory with some kind
>> of build script --- essentially the same set up as quick look test.
>>
>> Since this is an end-to-end test, I think it's actually more valuable
>> that you can take any v3 bundle built somewhere and run the tests.
>>
>> For example, when we modify HK2, Hudson can build a custom GFv3 + this
>> bleedging edge HK2, and then it can run your tests, before the rest of
>> GFv3 even sees this new build of HK2. In this way, by the time HK2 gets
>> integrated, chances of that breaking AMX will be much much less.
>>
>> Also, if the test itself is pushed to the Maven repository, then we
>> might be able to hook up execution of tests in several other places,
>> such as during the normal build of AMX.
>>
>>
>> I think there's a value in having a good harness that runs end-to-end
>> test, building on top of JUnit. Its usefulness goes far beyond just AMX.
>>
>>
>> Lloyd L Chambers wrote:
>>> I am currently trying to figure out how to port V2 AMX tests to V3.
>>>
>>> In V3, how can we support tests other than plain vanilla unit tests?
>>> - might or might not be true unit tests
>>> - might or might not be junit tests
>>> - might need special setup to execute.
>>>
>>> What I would like is formal support for compiling (and optionally
>>> executing) test code that lives other than under the test/ directory.
>>>
>>> More details--
>>>
>>> In V3 we have a structure that supports unit tests--source code goes
>>> under src/main/java and test code goes under src/test/java. The
>>> build compiles both automagically--very nice!
>>>
>>> In V2 I developed a fairly large set of tests for the AMX management
>>> API. While the tests are not unit tests in the usual sense, they
>>> junit.framework.TestCase tests, and run (in V2) using the junit test
>>> framework. The tests do *end-to-end* testing from a client to a
>>> running server, and given the inherent nature of what needs to be
>>> tested, this is the best approach for this particular case; mock
>>> objects offer little value since the goal is to test the end-to-end
>>> behavior, not some isolated piece of code.
>>>
>>> So let me call these "End to End Tests" or EETs. These don't work
>>> when placed in the test/ directory, since they require a test
>>> environment with a full running server--they'll all just fail. So I
>>> can't put my test code under tests/. Annotating them with @Ignore is
>>> no good either, because they *must* be run when the right setup is in
>>> place.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, if the test code does not live under test/, then it
>>> has to live elsewhere, along with some kind of build script. That
>>> means making that script rely on build products of the regular build,
>>> eg duplicating and maintaining knowledge found elsewhere in the build.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Lloyd L Chambers
>>> lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
>>> Sun Microsystems, Inc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>


-- 
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Sun Microsystems                   kohsuke.kawaguchi_at_sun.com