From: sankara rao bhogi <Sankara.Rao_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:36:19 +0530

Dragan Ljubojevic wrote:
> Why J2EETransaction.commit() implementation ignores cause of
> RollbackException? And why javax.transaction.RollbackException does not define/implement
> constructor RollbackException(String message, Throwable throwable);
>
>
>
> Current implementation of commit method catches
> RuntimeException, calls setRollbackOnly() and throws RollbackException with
> string key only(without cause).
>
>
>
>
> Will you break J2EE specification or lose some of
> distribution transaction features if you expand RollbackException class with
> new constructor and throw such constructed exception in commit() method?
>
> If
> not, can we expect such implementation in some of the future releases?
>
>
>
>
> Cause exception (i.e. SQLException ) can be useful in
> providing appropriate validation messages to web service clients. In this way
> we can put some input data validation on database back.
>

Please fine an issue.

regards
sankar
>
>
> Regards
> Dragan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>