Lloyd,
Currently, AMX is knows as sun's own implementation for JMX for EE5.
What is it going to be?
Will it be the part of JSR 160 or JSR 77?
Thanks,
Jim
Lloyd L Chambers wrote:
> Jim,
>
> AMX is JMX. You may use AMX MBeans directly or the dynamic proxies
> to them. These are public interfaces, whose stability is not subject
> to arbitrary change.
>
> Nothing else should be used as it is subject to change and are either
> implementation details, or private MBeans, many of which might
> disappear in the next release.
>
> Lloyd Chambers
> (AMX implementor)
>
> On Nov 20, 2006, at 1:14 AM, Jim Jiang wrote:
>
>>
>> As what described in the article 'AMX: Design and Use ', GF use AMX
>> to simplify the JMX using.
>> But JMX mbean's implementation still can be found in GF, I tried to
>> summarize their location in below table:
>>
>> JMX
>> AMX
>> Interface com.sun.enterprise.admin.mbeanapi
>> com.sun.appserv.management
>> Implementation com.sun.enterprise.admin
>> com.sun.enterprise.management
>>
>>
>> Could anyone explain the rules about how to choose AMX or JMX for
>> management?
>> Why not use AMX as the unique way ?
>>
>> Please correct me if anything wrong.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jim
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>