Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
> ...
>
> Now comes the work around part of it. Obviously we knew this will
> happen. So, there is a special value of a property (I wouldn't tell
> which one -- for it is an undocumented interface) which when used
> will do the "right" thing as you'd expect. As always, there are issues
> with this, but I feel they are manageable.
>
Please tell us what is this value. If not, I will grep the source code
(published) to find it (waste of my time).
For me, such a behavior is not an RFE, but a bug. UI should when needed
make the distinction between a null value and an empty value.
Null -> delete the property
Empty: treat it as ""
Thanks.
Ludo
> I'd want your RFE to actually make that "special empty value" an
> interface.
>
>
> Thanks and sorry,
> Kedar