Yes this works.
public class ConfigRefValidator
implements ConstraintValidator<ConfigRefConstraint, Server>, Payload {
But one of the unit test complained about the payload not returning an
empty array when I returned ConfigRefValidator.class as the default payload
public @interface ConfigRefConstraint {
String message() default "{configref.invalid}";
Class<?>[] groups() default {};
Class<? extends Payload>[] payload() default {ConfigRefValidator.class};
}
Putting it here, however, seems to work:
@ConfigRefConstraint(payload=ConfigRefValidator.class)
I can see the proper message displayed.
On 12/20/2010 3:34 PM, Tom Mueller wrote:
> The Payload returned ConfigRefConstraint can any class or interface
> that implements the Payload interface that is in the same Java package
> as ConfigRefConstraint. Can you just make the
> ConfigRegConstraintValidator implement Payload and return that?
>
> Tom
>